Criterion-level gaps
Priority is assigned to important rubric criteria that repeatedly fail across natural rollouts.
Rubric-Informed Selective Exploration for Open-Ended Reinforcement Learning
Aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) for open-ended tasks is challenging because responses must satisfy multidimensional criteria without following a single correct generation trajectory. Existing rubric-based reinforcement learning methods compress fine-grained criterion-level feedback into scalar rewards, making persistent capability gaps difficult to target under limited on-policy exploration.
RISE-RL uses repeatedly missed rubric criteria to elicit privileged trajectories that are difficult to discover through unguided exploration alone. It retains only trajectories whose complete-rubric reward exceeds the mean reward of natural rollouts, and re-evaluates them under the original prompt to emphasize behaviors that remain weakly supported by the natural policy.
Priority is assigned to important rubric criteria that repeatedly fail across natural rollouts.
Only privileged trajectories that beat the natural-rollout mean are retained.
Guidance is withdrawn after its reward advantage saturates, avoiding permanent dependence.
RISE-RL augments a natural-prompt GRPO branch with a selective rubric-guidance branch used only during early training. Guided candidates are judged with the complete rubric, filtered by reward gain, and forwarded again under the natural prompt. Policy-support shaping then emphasizes useful tokens that still have low probability under the natural policy.
Failure frequency and rubric importance jointly determine the highest-priority criteria for each prompt.
Guided responses must outperform the mean reward of natural rollouts under the complete original rubric.
Tokens with low support under the natural prompt receive stronger auxiliary weights, focusing learning on hard-to-discover behavior.
The guidance objective is separated from the natural GRPO group and switched off once its marginal benefit plateaus.
Across Writing, Chat, Health, and Science, RISE-RL achieves the highest average score at both the Qwen3-4B and Qwen3-14B scales. The improvements extend beyond subjective open-ended evaluation to objectively scored medical and scientific benchmarks.
The comparison reveals a two-stage learning pattern:
After guidance is removed, benchmark performance continues to improve while entropy stabilizes above the Rubric-RL baseline. This supports the central design choice: use guidance to discover behavior, not as a permanent training crutch.
@article{hou2026riserl,
title = {RISE-RL: Rubric-Informed Selective Exploration for Open-Ended Reinforcement Learning},
author = {Hou, Jinkun and Liu, Zhuo and Ren, Huimin and Xin, Hongsheng and Zhou, Pan and Zhan, Kun},
journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2608.09123},
year = {2026}
}